Market Opinion Poll For Thursday
Short and sweet. I'm just saving Darris a bit of time.
Thanks Mark. I was picking out Xmas picuture backgrounds with the wife and could not get access to the computer. LOL
Mark and/or Darris...
I'm wondering if tonight's poll is measuring what was intended, as the order is normally: bullish, neutral, bearish... but this time bearish is in the middle where neutral usually is. And I think neutral normally gets the most votes. I think we need a re-count. Somebody have a good magnifying glass to study the "dimpled chads" and "hanging chads" and....?
Which, btw, brings up a second point: Why, at Fearless Forecasters, do we need a neutral catagory for those to timid (fearful) to take a stand? I say if they can't even vote a simple up or down, then they certainly don't qualify as fearless forecasters.
I'm wondering if tonight's poll is measuring what was intended, as the order is normally: bullish, neutral, bearish... but this time bearish is in the middle where neutral usually is. And I think neutral normally gets the most votes. I think we need a re-count. Somebody have a good magnifying glass to study the "dimpled chads" and "hanging chads" and....?
Which, btw, brings up a second point: Why, at Fearless Forecasters, do we need a neutral catagory for those to timid (fearful) to take a stand? I say if they can't even vote a simple up or down, then they certainly don't qualify as fearless forecasters.
QUOTE (IYB @ Oct 16 2003, 01:03 AM)
Mark and/or Darris...
I'm wondering if tonight's poll is measuring what was intended, as the order is normally: bullish, neutral, bearish... but this time bearish is in the middle where neutral usually is. And I think neutral normally gets the most votes. I think we need a re-count. Somebody have a good magnifying glass to study the "dimpled chads" and "hanging chads" and....?
Which, btw, brings up a second point: Why, at Fearless Forecasters, do we need a neutral catagory for those to timid (fearful) to take a stand? I say if they can't even vote a simple up or down, then they certainly don't qualify as fearless forecasters.
I'm wondering if tonight's poll is measuring what was intended, as the order is normally: bullish, neutral, bearish... but this time bearish is in the middle where neutral usually is. And I think neutral normally gets the most votes. I think we need a re-count. Somebody have a good magnifying glass to study the "dimpled chads" and "hanging chads" and....?
Which, btw, brings up a second point: Why, at Fearless Forecasters, do we need a neutral catagory for those to timid (fearful) to take a stand? I say if they can't even vote a simple up or down, then they certainly don't qualify as fearless forecasters.
IYB,
Doing nothing is not a fearful action unless you are fearful. If it's the right thing to do, you certainly don't need to be fearful to do it, right?
Seriously, I think that the neutral readings are the most telling at times.
There's no way I'm getting rid of them.
Mark